luody

CNKI 中国博士学位论文全文数据库

民歌与国学

Official Tradition and Intellectual Narrations  

【作者】徐新建 【导师】曹顺庆

【作者基本信息】四川大学，比较文学与世界文学，2002年，博士


【中文摘要】 20世纪后期以来，对于跨文化背景下的比较诗学问题，中国学界出现了多种阐发。其中既有对本土文论“失语”的警示，也有对中国文化将成为21世纪主导的达观，以及对“和而不同”格局的倡导。本文转换角度，从民国时期的“歌谣运动”入手，重新梳理和辨析近代以来中国文论、诗学演变转型的文化原因和历史过程，并由此回顾和反思自那以来“中西交往”的因果关联。 本文共九章。首章论述歌谣运动从发起征集到并入国学的基本脉络。第二章与第三章集中讨论民国时期知识界发起歌谣运动的缘由以及相关的历史背景。第四章揭示知识界如何通过从文艺到学术的“民间转向”，投身于国民塑造与国史建构之中。第五和第六章分别论述同一时期音乐、民俗和人类学界对歌谣运动的参与，力图较为全面地认识那个时代“民歌研究”的整体面貌。第七章将歌谣运动中的“官方传统”与“学界传统”进行比照。第八章从中外互动的角度，分析“东洋”、“西洋”如何同样参与到中国学界近代以来的“民间转向”之中。第九章以朱自清为个案，试图再从微观的层面追溯已经逝去的歌谣运动“背影”。 简而论之，全文讨论的是四个相互联系的关键词，即：民、国、歌、学；既论述“民歌”、“国学”，又综观“民国歌学”。  

【英文摘要】 Following the reconstruction of a new global political and cultural order in the late 20th Century, the Chinese academia once again faces the dilemma: how to establish the root of its own culture and at the same time, how to participate in a multicultural world? On the aspect of comparative literature and cultural studies, such a dilemma turns into the necessity of further developing literary encounters and the possibility of poetic dialogues.Various explorations and elaborations of these important questions have emerged in the academia, including 1) the warning against the Native literary theory's "losing voice"; 2) the optimism believing that Chinese culture will become the leading global culture in the 21st Century; 3) the advocate of a "harmonious and different" future world. Approaching from a different perspective, the dissertation begins with the "Folklore Movement" during the era of the "Republic of China" (1912-1949). It explores the cultural motivations and the historical process of transformation of the Chinese literary theories and poetics and therefore reflects upon the correlations of "East-West" contact.The dissertation consists of nine chapters. The first chapter traces the emergence of "Folklore Movement" to its incorporation into Chinese Studies. The second and third chapters are closely related in an analysis of the "three-level structure" of traditional Chinese society with the focus on the causes of"Folklore Movement" and its historical background. Chapter Four is about the relationships between "new national ethos" and "new literature"/"new history." It reveals how the intellectuals participated in the construction of national history through the "folk turn" in both arts and humanities.Chapter Five and Six are about the roles of music, ethnic studies and anthropology in Folklore Movement. In an effort to transcend the disciplinary confinement, both chapters serve to provide a larger picture of the folklore studies of that time.Chapter Seven tackles with the "official" tradition during the Folklore movement and compares it with the "academic" tradition that has been given much more attention by its intellectual narrators. This chapter on the one hand stresses the impact of governmental administration on folklore and folk customs, on the other hand concerns with the constantly changing relationship between intellectuals and state interventions.Chapter Eight focuses on the influence from the outside on Chinese "folklore turn" since the 1860s. The last chapter uses professor Zhu Zhiqing, one of the famous Chinese scholars during the era of the Republic of China, as an example to review again the folklore research at an individual level.In brief speaking, what the paper discussed are four key words: Folk, State, Song and Academy. These key words can also be combined as connected p

【中文关键词】 比较诗学; 民歌; 国学; 歌谣

【英文关键词】 Comparative literature; folklore; Chinese history

【网络出版年期】2002年02期 【网络出版投稿人】四川大学 【网络出版投稿时间】2002-10-21 【DOI】CNKI:CDMD:1.2002.121772 攻读期成果